The smartwatch market has seen an incredible evolution over the last couple of years, with tech giants like Google joining in with its Pixel Watch series. The original Google Pixel Watch landed mixed reviews, with ample praise for its design but ample criticism over its battery life and fitness features. Fast-forward to the release of the Pixel Watch 2, and users are left wondering: should they upgrade? This article will provide a detailed comparison between the Pixel Watch and the Pixel Watch 2 so you can quickly decide which one will work best for you.
In this detailed review, we will go over all of those aspects—pricing, general performance, health monitoring capabilities, and more. At the end of it, you will know for sure which is the best smartwatch and if there are better options available in the market.
Pixel Watch vs Pixel Watch 2: The Verdict
Best Overall
When considering overall performance and user experience, the Pixel Watch 2 takes the crown. With enhancements in battery life, processing power, and health monitoring features, it stands out as a more refined option than its predecessor. Users can expect a smoother experience with improved functionality that caters to both casual users and fitness enthusiasts alike.
Best by Price
Both models are priced similarly at $349, making it a tough call for budget-conscious buyers. However, if you’re looking for value for money in terms of features and performance, the Pixel Watch 2 offers more advanced technology without any additional cost. Therefore, it provides better long-term value despite being at the same price point.
Best for Health Monitoring
For those focused on health tracking, the Pixel Watch 2 is undoubtedly superior. It introduces advanced sensors such as a multi-path heart rate sensor and skin temperature monitoring capabilities that were absent in the first model. These improvements make it an ideal choice for users who prioritize health metrics and fitness tracking.
Conclusion of Verdict
While both watches cater to different needs, the Pixel Watch 2 clearly outperforms its predecessor across various metrics. If you’re seeking a smartwatch that combines style with functionality—especially in health monitoring—the Pixel Watch 2 is your best bet.
Pixel Watch vs. Pixel Watch 2: Table Overview
| Feature | Pixel Watch | Pixel Watch 2 |
| Design and Build Quality | 80% recycled stainless steel, 36 grams | 100% recycled aluminum, 31 grams |
| Display | 1.2″ AMOLED, up to 1000 nits brightness | 1.2″ AMOLED, up to 1000 nits brightness |
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9110 | Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 |
| Battery Life | Up to 24 hours (with AOD inactive) | Up to 24 hours (with AOD active) |
| Health Monitoring Features | Basic heart rate and sleep tracking | Advanced features: multi-path heart rate sensor, skin temperature monitoring, continuous EDA sensor |
| User Interface | Wear OS 3.5 | Wear OS 4 |
| Connectivity Options | LTE (optional), Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC | LTE (optional), Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC |
| Weight | 36 grams | 31 grams |
| Price | $349 | $349 |
Pixel Watch vs Pixel Watch 2: Detailed Comparison
When it comes to choosing between the original Pixel Watch and the Pixel Watch 2, I believe it’s essential to dive deep into the specifics. Each aspect of these devices can significantly impact your experience, so let’s break down the key features and see how they stack up against each other.
Design and Build Quality
In my opinion, design is one of the first things that catches your eye when you look at a smartwatch. Both the Pixel Watch and Pixel Watch 2 feature a sleek, minimalist aesthetic that fits well in both casual and formal settings. The original Pixel Watch has a premium feel with its 80% recycled stainless steel casing, but I find that the Pixel Watch 2 takes it a step further with its use of 100% recycled aluminum.
This not only makes it lighter—at just 31 grams compared to the original’s 36 grams—but also more environmentally friendly, which I really appreciate.
The display on both models is a vibrant AMOLED screen measuring 1.2 inches, offering bright colors and sharp images. However, I’ve noticed that the Pixel Watch 2 has improved brightness levels, making it easier to read in direct sunlight. This is a crucial factor for me, especially when I’m outdoors.
Verdict: Overall, while both watches boast an attractive design, the Pixel Watch 2 edges out with its lighter weight and eco-friendly materials, making it not only stylish but also more sustainable.
Performance
Performance is where I think the Pixel Watch 2 truly shines. The original model is powered by Samsung’s Exynos 9110 processor, which was decent but often felt sluggish during heavy usage or when multitasking. In contrast, the Pixel Watch 2 features Qualcomm’s Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 chip. This upgrade results in noticeably faster performance—app launches are quicker, and navigating through menus feels smoother.
This difference in processing power means less frustration when using apps or switching between tasks. If you’re someone who likes to have multiple apps open or relies heavily on notifications throughout the day, this improvement can make a world of difference.
Verdict: The Pixel Watch 2 offers a significant performance boost over its predecessor, making it a better choice for users who demand speed and efficiency from their smartwatch.
Battery Life
One of my biggest concerns with smartwatches has always been battery life. The original Pixel Watch claimed to offer up to 24 hours of battery life, but in reality, many users—including myself—found that it often fell short, especially with features like always-on display activated.
The Pixel Watch 2, however, has addressed this issue effectively. With claims of lasting up to 24 hours even with continuous use of its features, I’ve found that it often exceeds expectations in real-world scenarios. Many users report getting over a day’s worth of usage without needing to recharge, which is a significant improvement for anyone who doesn’t want to be tethered to a charging cable every night.
For me personally, knowing that I can wear my watch throughout the day—including during workouts—and still have battery left for the evening is a game-changer.
Verdict: The battery life of the Pixel Watch 2 is a notable upgrade over the original model, providing peace of mind for users who need reliable performance throughout their busy days.
Health Monitoring Features
When it comes to health tracking capabilities, the Pixel Watch 2 is where I see the most compelling advancements. The original model offered basic heart rate monitoring and sleep tracking, which was fine for casual users but lacked depth for those serious about their fitness.
The Pixel Watch 2, on the other hand, introduces several advanced health features that I find incredibly valuable:
- Multi-path heart rate sensor: This technology provides more accurate heart rate readings during workouts compared to traditional sensors.
- Skin temperature monitoring: This feature allows you to keep track of changes in your body temperature over time, which can be particularly useful for identifying potential health issues.
- Continuous electrodermal activity (cEDA) sensor: This innovative addition helps monitor stress levels throughout the day.
For someone like me who values detailed health insights—whether for fitness goals or general wellness—the improvements in health monitoring make the Pixel Watch 2 an easy choice. It feels like having a personal health assistant on my wrist.
Verdict: The health monitoring enhancements in the Pixel Watch 2 significantly elevate its value for fitness enthusiasts and those focused on overall wellness compared to the original model.
User Interface
User experience is another crucial area in which I believe the Pixel Watch 2 excels. Both watches run on Google’s Wear OS; however, there are notable differences in their interfaces. The original Pixel Watch launched with Wear OS 3.5, which was functional but sometimes felt clunky.
With Pixel Watch 2, you get Wear OS 4 right out of the box. This version brings an updated interface with dynamic theming options, and new watch faces that allow for greater personalization. I’ve found navigating through apps and settings much more intuitive on the newer model. The responsiveness is improved, too; swiping and tapping feel fluid rather than laggy.
As someone who enjoys customizing their tech devices to reflect personal style and preferences, I find these enhancements really resonate with me.
Verdict: The user interface upgrades in the Pixel Watch 2 lead to a more enjoyable experience overall, making it easier for users to interact with their devices seamlessly.
Connectivity Options
Both models offer robust connectivity options, including LTE (optional), Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, and NFC capabilities for contactless payments. However, due to its upgraded internal hardware, I’ve noticed that connectivity reliability has improved significantly in the Pixel Watch 2.
In my daily use—whether you’re at home or out running errands—you’ll experience fewer dropped connections and faster syncing with your smartphone compared to the original model. This reliability makes a big difference when you’re depending on your smartwatch for notifications or fitness tracking while on the go.
Verdict: With improved connectivity reliability in the Pixel Watch 2, users can expect a more stable experience when interacting with their devices throughout daily activities.
Price Comparison
Both devices are priced similarly at $349; however, given that they offer similar pricing but vastly different features, investing in the Pixel Watch 2 is recommended for anyone looking to maximize their purchase value.
Verdict: At the same price point as its predecessor but offering superior features across multiple categories, the Pixel Watch 2 represents better value for money.
Alternatives to Pixel Watch and Pixel Watch 2 that Might Fit Better to Your Needs
While both models are impressive in their own right, there are alternatives available that may better suit specific requirements:
Samsung Galaxy Watch6
- Exceptional Battery Life: Lasts up to 40 hours on a single charge, ideal for busy lifestyles.
- Extensive App Ecosystem: Access to a wide range of apps via the Google Play Store, enhancing functionality.
- Robust Fitness Tracking: Features heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and various workout modes.
- Seamless Integration: Works well with Samsung devices for managing notifications and calls directly from your wrist.
Fitbit Sense 2
- Advanced Health Monitoring: Includes continuous electrodermal activity (cEDA) sensor for stress tracking.
- Comprehensive Metrics: Tracks heart rate variability, skin temperature, and SpO2 levels for holistic health insights.
- Fitbit App Integration: Offers detailed insights and trends, including daily stress management scores.
- Built-in GPS: Supports over 40 exercise modes, making it ideal for outdoor activities without a smartphone.
Garmin Venu Sq
- Built-in GPS: Accurate tracking of distance and pace during workouts without needing a smartphone.
- Advanced Fitness Metrics: Provides VO2 max estimates, training status, and recovery time recommendations.
- Vibrant AMOLED Display: Easy to view stats in bright sunlight; supports animated workouts on-screen.
- Long Battery Life: Up to six days in smartwatch mode, ensuring reliability during extended activities.
Pro Tip
Before making your purchase decision on smartwatches like the Pixel series or any alternatives mentioned above, consider exploring our marketplace at Prelaunch. You can find innovative products that may offer unique features tailored to your specific needs!
Conclusion
Overall, while both smartwatches share similarities in design and basic functionality, all these facts lead me to firmly believe that the Pixel Watch 2 significantly outshines its predecessor across various metrics—performance, battery life, health monitoring features, user experience, and connectivity reliability all point towards a superior device.
If you’re considering upgrading or purchasing your first smartwatch, I wholeheartedly recommend opting for the Pixel Watch 2; it truly represents a leap forward in technology and usability that aligns well with today’s demands for smart wearables.